Use cases
Schools, healthcare providers and legal teams need to talk to people safely. Consumer apps expose phone numbers, sit outside oversight and leave no record you control. LINK fixes all three.
The risk
Staff use personal phones and WhatsApp groups with pupils and parents. Numbers leak, conversations happen out of sight, and there is nothing to show an inspector or investigator.
With LINK
Staff and families connect through LINK without exchanging numbers. Connections are consent-gated and approved, and the audit trail gives designated safeguarding leads a record they can trust.
The risk
Clinicians message patients from personal devices, exposing their own contact details and creating patient data the organisation cannot govern.
With LINK
Identity is decoupled from the conversation, so neither side sees personal details. Retention and access sit with the organisation, not with individual phones.
The risk
Sensitive reports arrive by personal email or chat, where the reporter is exposed and the organisation cannot prove who saw what.
With LINK
Pseudonymous reporting, dual-administrator override and an immutable audit log let you investigate fairly while protecting the person who spoke up.
It exposes personal phone numbers, sits outside school oversight and leaves no record the school controls. Most safeguarding policies discourage it. LINK lets staff communicate without ever exchanging a phone number or email, with every connection approved and logged.
Consumer messaging apps share contact details and metadata, and the organisation cannot enforce retention or audit access. LINK decouples identity from the conversation, so patients and clinicians are not exposed to each other's personal details.
LINK offers end-to-end encrypted messaging with an immutable, cryptographic audit trail and dual-administrator override, so oversight is possible without giving any single person unchecked access.
Yes. Reports are pseudonymous rather than absolutely anonymous: the reporter's identity is not shown to the recipient, but access is invitation-only and every action is recorded.
No. LINK is invitation-only. Organisations apply for access and every request is reviewed by a person.
Access is invitation-only. Every application is reviewed by a person.